Therefore, If your intent to cause injury is proven and it is further proven that inside the ordinary course of nature, that injury would cause death, that matter is now objective and the intention to get rid of (the main factor that must

Some sites might specialize in specific areas of legislation, while others offer a broader database. Factors to look at when selecting a website consist of the comprehensiveness on the database, the benefit of navigation, and the availability of advanced search options.

Case files may also be accessed from the public access terminals within the clerk’s office from the court where the case was filed. 

To report technical problems with our Website, please contact the webmaster. The webmaster will not reply to inquiries seeking legal tips or specific cases. Questions regarding specific cases should be directed to your court in which the case has long been or will be filed.

لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................

This Court may perhaps interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in a very manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding achieved by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court could interfere with the conclusion or even the finding and mould the relief to make it suitable to your facts of every case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority is the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or even the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified via the decision on the Supreme Court in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Given the legal analysis on the subject issue, website we've been from the view that the claim of the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle isn't legally audio, In addition to promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, These are subject matter to rules and regulations In case the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case in the petitioners for promotion might be regarded, however, we've been clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be deemed for seniority and promotion given that the seniority is reckoned from the date of regular appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Health, issue to availability of vacancy subject on the approval of the competent authority. Read more

The issue here is that an accused may perhaps say that they intended to injure the target, but they did not plan to kill them. In other words, they could claim that thedeath that resulted because of the accused’s attack was neither foreseeable nor meant.

Section 302 from the PPC outlines the punishment for “Qatl-i-Amd” (intentional murder) in Pakistan. According to this provision, if a person intentionally causes the death of another individual, they shall be matter for the most severe form of punishment permissible under Pakistani law.

Please note, if you are seeking a rate exemption from a single court and/or for non-research purposes, contact that court directly. 

Legal Defenses: An accused person charged under Section 302 PPC can present legal defenses for example self-defense, insanity, or accidental killing, which might lead to reduced charges or acquittal.

The case of *R v. Ahmed* exemplifies the sensible application of this amendment and its possible to protected financial interests and maintain the integrity in the national currency. As legal practitioners and citizens, an extensive grasp of these changes is vital for upholding the principles of justice and contributing to a sturdy legal system.

In addition, it addresses the limitation period under Article 91 and 120 of the Limitation Act, focusing on when plaintiff to hunt cancellation. The importance of deciding application under Order VII Rule eleven CPC based solely on plaint averments in highlighted, excluding extrinsic material at this stage. Read more

competent authority has determined the eligibility on the private respondents and found them for being fit for promotion. CP dismissed(Promotion)